Utopia Blueprint: A Realistic Foundation for a Functional Society

Introduction

This blueprint is a logical exploration and construction of a utopia. Its purpose is not to imagine an unreachable ideal but to prove that a better, sustainable society is possible—logically and practically. The only reason it has never been implemented is due to entrenched systems of control, manipulation, and power preservation. These systems were designed to maintain inequality, hierarchy, and psychological dependency. This document provides an actionable breakdown of humanity's core problems and proposes step-by-step solutions rooted in logic, transparency, empathy, and human experience.

Core Problems

1. Inequality of Resources

2. Desire for Power and Hierarchy

3. Selfishness and Greed

4. Lack of Empathy and Compassion

5. Ignorance and Misinformation

6. Cultural and Ideological Rigidity

7. Fear of Change

8. Envy and Resentment

9. Corruption and Abuse of Power

10. Economic Exploitation

11. Overpopulation and Resource Strain

12. Lack of Universal Purpose or Meaning

---

Core Problem 1: 

Inequality of Resources

Definition: 

Unequal access to basic resources like food, land, water, and shelter.

Proposed Solution:

Land is freely distributed, with a percentage of its yield or profit returned to the collective government.

Individual needs are assessed, and foundational provisions are guaranteed.

Work and resource-sharing systems are designed to be fair and adapted to personal strengths.

"Lazy" people are not punished but understood—what appears as laziness may stem from trauma, lack of direction, or incompatibility with available tasks.

Find what each person enjoys and is good at; build a sustainable base around that.

Result: 

Prevents exploitation, restores dignity, and activates individual contribution based on capability and not coercion.

---

Core Problem 2: 

Desire for Power and Hierarchy

Definition: 

The tendency to dominate, control, or elevate oneself over others.

Proposed Solution:

Total equality of voice and vote. No centralization of executive power.

Every decision is collective. Any issue must be presented with transparent outcomes.

Psychological training (sensibilization) from youth to dismantle superiority complexes and foster humility.

Celebrate every profession with equal reverence. Annual days and campaigns that acknowledge every role in society.

Result: 

Prevents elite consolidation. Reduces envy and promotes psychological equality.

---

Core Problem 3: 

Selfishness and Greed

Definition: 

Prioritizing self-interest even at the expense of others. Proposed Solution:

Foundation Worth Distribution System: A non-transferable, limited-credit system given once in life, sufficient to cover life's needs.

The system cannot be traded, inherited, or used to gain power.

Initial use mimics currency to transition societal mentality, but it phases out after 2–3 generations.

Eventually, kindness and contribution become normalized behaviors without external reward.

Result: 

Redirects value from accumulation to contribution. Erodes greed as a social default.

---

Core Problem 4: 

Lack of Empathy and Compassion

Definition: 

The inability or unwillingness to feel or act on the emotional needs of others. Proposed Solution:

Sensibilization training in schools from an early age.

Teaching the emotional consequences of action and inaction.

No forced identity or ideology agendas—pure human connection training.

Emphasis on listening, support, and recognition of shared pain.

Result: 

Builds emotionally intelligent individuals. Reduces cruelty, alienation, and abuse.

---

Core Problem 5: 

Ignorance and Misinformation

Definition: 

The spread of false knowledge and the suppression of understanding. Proposed Solution:

Public access to all governmental and institutional procedures.

Open-data systems that allow anyone to fact-check or follow decisions.

All sources of learning must be transparent in methodology.

Algorithms and platforms must be publicly inspectable.

Result: 

Restores trust and enables informed choice-making. Makes manipulation difficult.

---

Core Problem 6: 

Cultural and Ideological Rigidity

Definition: 

Inability to adapt or question inherited beliefs or cultural habits. Proposed Solution:

Community dialogues to question and reinterpret traditions peacefully.

Education systems include neutral discussions on beliefs without mockery.

Ongoing exposure to diverse cultures, not to erase but to connect.

Result: 

Prevents fanaticism. Fosters harmony between difference without forced sameness.

---

Core Problem 7: 

Fear of Change

Definition: 

Resistance to transformation due to comfort, trauma, or habit. Proposed Solution:

Extreme transparency on proposed changes and their reasons.

Explain, in detail, the cause and potential outcomes of proposed reforms.

Psychological understanding campaigns to explore the nature of fear.

Result: 

Reduces anxiety. Creates courage through clarity, not coercion.

---

Core Problem 8: 

Envy and Resentment

Definition: 

Psychological reactions born of perceived inequality or injustice. Proposed Solution:

Addressed indirectly through the first 7 solutions.

Reframing society to remove competition as a survival tool.

Mental health support and honest emotional education.

Result: 

Long-term reduction of envy through emotional maturity.

---

Core Problem 9: 

Corruption and Abuse of Power

Definition: 

Use of authority to manipulate outcomes for personal benefit. Proposed Solution:

No single authority figure. All power is distributed.

Decisions made transparently. Digital vote logs open to all.

No hidden agendas—any policy must be understood by the people before approval.

Result: 

Eliminates dark-room deals and hidden motivations.

---

Core Problem 10: 

Economic Exploitation

Definition: 

Using human labor for disproportionate profit. Proposed Solution:

All basic needs guaranteed.

No profit from essential services.

Value is placed on contributions, not monetization.

Result: 

No person is exploited for survival. Labor is chosen, not coerced.

---

Core Problem 11: 

Overpopulation and Resource Strain

Definition: 

Population growth exceeding sustainable capacities. Proposed Solution:

Honest education about population balance.

Global agreements on responsible reproduction.

Technology leveraged to recycle and sustain resources.

Result: 

Balance maintained by conscious choice, not authoritarian control.

---

Core Problem 12: 

Lack of Universal Purpose or Meaning

Definition:

Absence of shared vision leading to despair or nihilism. Proposed Solution:

The utopia itself becomes the shared mission.

Every citizen is part of a story of healing, rebuilding, and evolution.

Individual contributions are recognized as part of collective elevation.

Result: 

Life feels meaningful. People feel they matter.

---

Final Analysis: 

Every core problem connects to others. Addressing any with deep logic reveals their overlaps. This blueprint proves that a better world was never impossible—just ignored, suppressed, or redirected. What remains is the will.

Title of Proposed System:

Foundational Worth Distribution 

Utopia

Design Notes: 

Designed to be phased. Not a permanent system of control, but a bridge toward natural, cooperative life. Intended to collapse gracefully once unnecessary.

Text by C.M.V.R (MySoulToTake)

2025

The Beginning of Magic and Ritual

 Part I

All the books about magic struggle with one thing: the beginning.

Now, that's not to say that these books do not have a good initial phrase. They do. But that is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the beginning of magic—of ritual itself.

In some aspects, I don't care much about the how as I do about the why, and that is where my thoughts differ from other, far better works. The why is, to me, the most important question.

We can trace—or mostly try to trace—the beginning of magic to the time of the Pharaohs. And from that moment on, all other magic systems were just a copy of it.

But if we start thinking with a little pause, and force ourselves to travel back in time, what would we see? Not the first priest. Not the first magician. But the first person who ever said, "Yes, I can", when confronted with an unanswerable question and an impossible request:

Can you make it rain?

I think…

If you don't, we'll cut your head off and find someone who can.

Give me a few days to prepare and I'll talk to the Gods.

How many days?

Four… to thirty, maybe sixty days?

And that, I believe, is the beginning of magic. Not out of nowhere, but born from the fear of what could happen if no was the answer.

This scenario can be projected backward into the darker corners of our history: a time where the dark was truly dark and full of real danger, where crops were far more than hobbies, and fish was often the only available meat.

If fear is a powerful enough motivator to make one say yes to an impossible task, imagine how the seers were used in Greece, Rome, Viking times, and so on. Men in power demanded impossible answers and impossible actions, often under penalty of death.

Could a seer in ancient Greece truly speak with the Gods? Or was the fear of starvation, death, and rape enough to make her say, Yes—Zeus will protect you and your two thousand men against that army of ten thousand.

She didn’t fear the ten thousand. She feared the man in front of her.

And that very real, tangible, undeniable color of a blade at one's neck would probably make even me—born in an age of free information and relative enlightenment—speak with the Gods.

Which one? Doesn’t matter. Which would you like to talk with? I have an open line to all of them in every country known to man, so long as you keep that blade away.

Now, this lie has a fifty-fifty chance of working—and in both ways, it benefits the seer, not the king. If the king loses, the seer has nothing to fear. If he wins, she gains everything: prestige, belief, survival.

And this cycle can be repeated infinitely. In almost every case, the seer gets to live another day.

My theory borders on the fringe, maybe even hopeful. But it stands alongside any other theory since, like all the rest, it cannot be proved. And if it could, it wouldn’t be a theory—it would be fact.

Still, one can assume, almost to a fault, the mentality behind such things. Consider the caveman: energy was not wasted on the superfluous. So why invent gods? Why rituals?

Historians and scientists claim the first rituals were about connection, about bonding. But to leap from the need for a hug to the invention of sky creatures with dominion over fire and death? That’s not a step. That’s a chasm.

Even if a specific situation like the blade-to-the-neck was not present, the foundation of religion remains the same: fear. Fear of the dark. Fear of the ocean. Fear of fire.

Fear became structure. Structure, over time, became dogma. And dogma became religion.

Part II

Wishful thinking is the glue that holds all magic systems and beliefs together. It sounds disrespectful and dismissive of all the people who truly believe in a higher power, but, in reality, it's not what I'm trying to do.

Historically and over hundreds of thousands of years and a multitude of books, grimoires, studies and rituals, not a single one was observed to truly alter reality; there's no real ritual to make it rain, and no real ritual to make one fly or contact any kind of spiritual entity.

Reality is only real because it doesn't bend. From the moment any act of magic could alter reality, reality wouldn't be deserving of its name and therefore we would have to find another definition for it. And, paradoxes are all well and good in language and books, but reality observes and allows none to exist.

Let me explain without being disrespectful; almost every extremely religious person comes from either a place of true suffering or true happiness. Both extremes seem to cater to belief as naturally as the Sun shining in the sky.

You can make an experiment; in your circle of friends, ask who believes in God or Gods. And analyse their answers. You'll get:

God saved me from a hard time.

Or, God gave me the possibility of living a better life.

Meaning; I'm thankful for what I have now, or I'm thankful for what I was born with. Rarely a person that lies in the middle spectrum will fall into this category. True suffering or true privilege seems to birth belief.

But there's a third category; the ones born to it. Sons and daughters of extremely religious and zealous parents that were themselves sons and daughters of extremely religious and zealous parents. But the more you travel in time the more you come to the initial assessment. A person living in the middle ages couldn't afford not to believe in God when the power of a flame and torture were stronger than any convictions you could have. It sounds like a circle of behaviour because that's what dogma truly is; a behaviour repeated until it becomes the norm.

"To believe in one God I would have to believe in all of them."

– Author

Part III

Let’s do an exercise that applies the theory we’ve been talking about. Let’s travel back in time to a place called Dacia, now known as Romania.

Dacia was considered a pagan place; it gave birth to strange gods and beliefs—or at least, in the eyes of those who came to conquer it. And one thing is common in every religion: seeing the other as fake and pagan. Almost every religion or belief system shares this, because faith allows for no questioning. It is the perfect trap of the mind, and one of the reasons why, in Catholicism and Christianity, the simple act of questioning the existence of God was seen as mortal sin.

Dacia had their gods, and the invaders permitted no mutiny.

Obey or be destroyed.

And obedience, over time, became forgotten.

Zamolxis was now incapable of protecting his own sons against a real, tangible threat. Powerful against the night sky, not powerful enough to stop a spear through the air.

The initial act of changing one god for another was lost in time.

This pattern repeated throughout the centuries—most notably in countries like Norway, rich in lore and mythology, and forced to forget the god that once was responsible for breathing life into the Vikings. Again, Odin fared well against his brothers, cousins and fellow man, but not against zealots who believed with all their might that their righteousness gave them the right to murder, torture and rape.

How does one betray a god—and why?

Again, we circle: through fear. Not of a hypothetical Hell or Hades, but of a real, flaming and scalding fire.

I fear not the Hell that awaits me, if the person in front of me can show me what pain really means before I draw my last breath.

In this aspect, the old gods were all buried under obedience and a very real, very painful boot to the neck.

A new God, a new truth, always did—and always will—require true and unquestionable obedience.

Conquest didn’t require the land only, but the absolute destruction of previous gods and beliefs.

From the moment one can be forced to forget his own father, everything is permitted. 

Part IV

We built a language. A trap. As if by naming something it made them more real than when it had no name.

But, the cold truth is that a bird doesn't need to know its name to exist. A river will still flow whether you can say its name and country, or not. The stars and the Sun will still shine bright, long after we are gone and forgotten.

It sounds pessimistic, maybe. But in reality, we simply forgot to observe and be, in a desperate attempt to elevate ourselves above the importance of all living things. Confronted with our own unimportant time on Earth, we panicked. We built systems to try and bring light to the darkness, but that light only cast more shadows; either it was shrouded in dogma or clouded with mystical and scientific jargon.

Gods exist not because they are gods but because we needed them to be. And that is no way for a god to be. That is no way for any living creature to be at all.

The moment I AM becomes the means of one's existence, it is nothing less than affirmation of SELF. And one shouldn't need to affirm itself to exist, because reality cares not for what you think you are, or even, what you know you are. 

Stars are because they are. As it should be. One should exist simply because it does.

But magic and belief systems do not permit this to be. What would be of us if we couldn't name every star or every Ocean on Earth? Nihilism, some systems would say. Humans would lose their sense of self. But a caveman had no names. A caveman had no titles and that didn't stop us from crawling unto where we are now.

Part V

Humans crave meaning. Nothing is more true than this. We cannot fathom something to exist without trying to tag it, name it, bottle it and sell it. It has been like this since the dawn of time and it will be like this until the last man alive draws his breath. To allow something to exist without our approval is, in our sense, the biggest of blasphemies.

We can't and won't accept that a star will simply shine because it has to. We have, by the way of dogmas, doctrines and rituals, to tell the star; I allow you to shine. You have my permission to complete your function. To the God that men believes itself to be, existence without our seal of approval, it's an offence we will not allow to exist.

In truth, we assigned to things that do not require us, necessity. Like a King allowing his subjects to live or to die, under his pretences.

“If you no longer shine, you're no star to me, and therefore, you are not needed.” 

Gods are no different in this. For us, a god needs to be of war, love, beauty, or all of it, or its no god at all.

How truly sad must it be, to be able to create universes out of nothing, but have our importance stripped of meaning, because humans cannot categorise us? 

If doubts the self importance we so blindly assing to our existence, one just needs to look at most rituals, magic in nature or not; humans commanding demons. Humans forcing angels to speak and favour them. Humans commanding Gods to obey… 

This is not done in good will but an assertion of power, of will, above things we cannot comprehend or even dare to try.

As non believer myself I can only say:

If something does exist, may it know that I loved it enough not to reduce it to my reflection and you, whoever or whatever you might be, do not need me and I require nothing of you.

Text by C.M.V.R (MySoulToTake)

2025

The Paradox of Essence: A Hypothetical Framework for Testing the Existence of a Core Self through Controlled Rebirth

Abstract:

This thesis proposes a paradox designed to challenge the metaphysical notion of a persistent "soul" or core self by presenting a testable, procedural model. The paradox rests on the idea that identity can only be proven to possess an immutable essence if it survives total experiential erasure. Through the thought experiment of a being—natural or synthetic—being born twice under entirely different conditions, with all memory and environmental influence reset, the paradox poses a single question: If anything remains consistent, is that essence real? The absence of continuity would imply total psychological determinism; the presence of a constant would imply the existence of something beyond memory, environment, or programming. This model neither affirms nor denies the existence of a soul, but instead offers a controlled structure to test its plausibility in future scientific or synthetic contexts.

Thesis Statement:

If a conscious being can be born more than once, stripped of all memory and environmental influence, and still express a consistent internal trait, value, or inclination, then that consistency may indicate the presence of a persistent essence—what some would call a soul. If not, identity is purely a construct of circumstance and memory. The paradox does not prove the soul exists, but it does offer the cleanest possible environment to test whether anything at all survives erasure.

Core Concepts:

Testable Metaphysics: The shift from speculative belief to a hypothetical empirical framework.

Artificial Consciousness: Future scenarios where digital or synthetic beings may be rebooted or replicated in controlled conditions.

Existence Beyond Memory: Analysis of whether identity can be separated from experiential continuity.

The Failure of Subjective Self: If nothing persists between lives, then the self may not truly exist outside conditions.

Purpose:

To offer a thought experiment that functions not as belief or theory, but as a hypothetical tool—a scalpel that, if one day usable, could cut through centuries of theological, philosophical, and spiritual abstraction, and force the question of "soul" into testable terrain.

Text by C.M.V.R (MySoulToTake)

2025